
A travel first đ¤Śââď¸

Peripatetic, Writer, Harbinger of Mirth
A variety of delighting sights; a smattering of happenings; a compendium of concepts…

Airbnb reviews only permit 1000 characters. So here’s my full review of a place I stayed in Cairns, Australia đ¤Ş:
âI’ve been a poor university student for the last four years, but staying here is the first time Iâve felt like it.â âa fellow guest at Anitaâs Airbnb
Internal tension is not, generally speaking, what one seeks in an Airbnb. Yet during my 6 days at Anitaâs place in Cairns, I found myself not only experiencing a profound sense of dissatisfaction, but somehow enjoying that dissatisfaction and feeling grateful for its lessons.
Anitaâs place somehow provides slightly-above-spartan accommodations at slightly-above-discount prices, but in a hodgepodge of uncanny ways. Iâll give an example: The room boasts plenty of wall outlets â at my count 6 â which is very desirable in an Airbnb room. However, the majority of these outlets are placed above the head on oneâs bed, and at no point has any person said âIâd like to plug in my devices right here, above my pillow, with no location to place the device while itâs charging.â The shower, too, isnât quite wrong but seems like it was designed by someone who had heard what people like in a shower but never used one themselves, as it boasts beautiful tiling, ample hot water, and bountiful nozzle settings, but also dampens your towel because the only place to hang it is on the inside of the shower door. The outdoor dining table is a lovely place to chat with a fellow traveler on a warm summer evening, yet this delight is diminished by the requirement that you wave at the automatic light sensor every 30 seconds to turn it back on.
If thereâs a word to describe my stay at Anitaâs in Cairns, that word would be it: âuncannyâ. Itâs uncanny that I would find the mattress perfectly comfortable, yet also awaken with a hip pain of a sort that Iâve never before experienced. Itâs uncanny that I would have a long conversation with the host about making the internet work in my room, which it definitely didnât beforehand and after which it somehow magically does. Itâs uncanny that the Airbnb listing includes twenty-three (23) rules which one must follow during tenancy, and then posters and text messages upon arrival add an additional three (3), and yet existing in this space gives you the sense that breaking the majority of them would simply be ignored. As I was leaving, I snuck a glance inside Anitaâs room, and was shocked to see it resembled a security office. If she has three screens of cameras, all presumably monitoring and recording, then why are the drying rack and kitchen trash can always overflowing? I suspect the only rule that Anita enforces strictly is the âabsolutely no guestsâ policy, but somehow also get the niggling suspicion that her uncanniness would give me the thumbs-up on updating my Airbnb reservation from 1 guest to 2 as Iâm walking home with a sweetheart in real time.
Anitaâs Airbnb gives the impression of an earnest person really truly trying their best but tripping in random ways. Sure, she spams you with a bunch of tour and travel options immediately after you make your reservation, but after that initial volley itâs not like sheâs pushy – or even brings them up again. Yes, sheâll make a bit of huff when youâre on your phone at 8:58pm and quiet hours start at 9pm, but itâs the sort of gentle and direct huff that makes you wonder whether you actually were being too loud for even pre-quiet hours. And then, when youâre quieter, itâs somehow totally fine that you talk until 10. The place is spartan yet functional, and isnât functional what matters? If travel is about exploring a new place, and therefore yourself, isnât it appropriate that you finally feel like a poor university student if thatâs what you are? Still, itâs not particularly pleasant to feel like a poor university student, so I give Anitaâs place three stars.
These four functions are separable: each can be on or off individually. There are 22 different combinations. Some of them have names. E.g. Try + Worry + Do (without Caring) is called âBeing triggeredââ, Care + Do (without Worry or Try) is called âBeing in Flowâ, and âMaturityâ or âExpertiseâ is Care + Try (with decreased Worry and Do).
I have a hunch that we exist in many or all of the 22 mental states at different times, and that one could use these mappings to intentionally move between states. (E.g. When âPracticingâ, aim to be in Worry, Care, Try, and Do, but when âPlayingâ, exclusively Care and Do.)
Iâm considering making a flowchart of the 22 different possible states, with arrows + tactical blurbs indicating when one should be in them and how to move between them. Thanks for reading this blurb â I have three quick questions for you:
This article is an anonymous guest post by a brilliant writer and dear friend. Its views and opinions may or may not represent my own. They certainly represent my friend.
Remember when you werenât a total asshole for getting all of your friends sick? Youâd show up to the party with a little sniffle and say âyeah I was throwing up yesterday, it sucked, but Iâm a trooper so here I am at Feb Club.â A few days later a few of the people would get sick and think âugh, I must have gotten it from them.â It sucked for maybe 24 hours but wasnât that big of a deal.
I remember that time, when my willpower was the only thing standing between me and my friends. I worked the long hours to make the money. Iâd take the craziest flights with the craziest layovers. I would stay up all hours of the night finishing homework I shouldâve done yesterday. This community. This connection. This is what matters.
Iâve looked forward to my college reunion since the day that I graduated. I remember standing in a circle with my friends in the Trumbull courtyard, pieces of smashed tobaccoless pipes scattered across the stone, and thinking âat least Iâll get to relive this moment in five years. I know it wonât be the same. I know everyone in this circle wonât be here again. But I will be here.â
Until I couldnât. At year five, the entire event was canceled. It wasnât safe to invite a global population to gather. At year six, the invitation was open and I was forced to decline. At any other point in history, I wouldâve shrugged off my cold symptoms and carried on. In 2022, one faint pink line trapped me behind the glass watching snapshots of my friends reunite without me.
Over two years later the pandemic still is thrashing through our lives wreaking havoc in more ways than one. We all find ourselves forced to draw a line in the sand and wage an internal battle with ourselves of when we can cross it. Each wave of new information eradicates our former boundaries and forces us to draw a new line. Even if we plant our feet firmly in the ground and refuse to move, itâs inevitable that the current pulls us as we tumble through the wave.
When we come up for air, we find weâve drifted further apart than we ever have before. And many of us will decide itâs not worth the risk to find our way back to center.
Weeks ago, my friends said, âwe will do anything to make it happen.â Outdoors. Masks. 6ft. Not ideal but doable. A thin line where we could meet without crossing boundaries. When the day came I found myself alone in Central Park, surrounded by strangers, because no one came. Despite all of the texts filled with brief apologies I couldnât help scanning the crowds at each turn. I knew my friends were somewhere among them, just out of reach.
I read their promises: âwe will see each other again soon.â And for the first time, I donât believe them. Weâve changed. We have new priorities. âWhen my semester ends.â âWhen work slows down.â âOnce I move into my new apartment.â ⌠And as much as I want to recall those feelings of connection and belonging over the smashed tobaccoless pipes, the rejection I feel now is overwhelming.
As my friends took their last maskless selfies before heading into New York City, some took the virus with them. They had spent three days dancing, drinking, kissing peers who had flown in from all around the world in blissful ignorance.
At the end of the day, the passengers on the train, the patrons in the restaurant, and the millions of strangers in New York were worth the risk. I wasnât.
Maybe this is the same path taken time and time again. Friends grow up, and move on. But something today feels different. This virus has accelerated the timeline. It stole two years of our youth. It stole the days when our priority was still finding each other. It dumped us on the other side, scarred and unprepared for the conversations that lie ahead in our relationships.
Itâs no oneâs fault. Iâm still angry.
Maybe we should more clearly mark our boundaries. Maybe I need to stop forcing people to draw their line in the sand.
Maybe life is just that hard and all we can do is try to keep our own heads above the water.
For now, I continue to sit in my disbelief. Staring at a puzzle that I have no interest in completing. And just wait for all this to be over.
Today, only dozens of people in the world know how to play this game. In 5 years, it will be massively popular (on the order of 100k or 1M+ players). I’m going to popularize it. I’m publishing this post in part to spread it wide and in part to plant my flag before it becomes huge.
How to play is linked here. (I’ll update that document as I iterate on the particularities of the rules. The basic structure, however, is solid.) I’ve also pasted the current version of the rules below:
Diveball
Materials:
Setup:
Definitions:
Play:
Illegal actions (i.e. âfoulsâ):
A game works like this:
A match works like this:
Clarifications:
As the Olympics is one of my favorite holidays, I’ve viewed many, many competitions. These are my favorites, along with my custom awards for arbitrary categories:
Men’s high jump: Best celebration. (The audio is in Italian because the announcer is Italian.)
Men’s 400m hurdles. Wins my award for best athletic performance.
Interview with 2nd place finished in men’s 400m hurdles. This guy ran a world record… and came in second. Wins my award for greatest heartbreak.
Women’s karate. Wins my award for coolest badass.
Women’s speed climbing (the climber on the left). Wins my award for most impressive precisely-honed skill.
Diving. Wins my award for most impressive child. (#14YearsOld???)
My award for best dogpile (starts at ~45secs, but the beginning provides context).
Greatest celebration (including “greatest kangaroo”, who is the gent in grey wearing flip flops).
(Contains spoilers.)
Itâs an odd arc for a movie to follow Goodness itself. Most stories teach us lessons by showing us a person: we match the Good parts of ourselves with this protagonist in the film. The Good parts undergo trials but ultimately prevail.
In this movie, however, bad behavior is punished. Itâs the sort of movie that would answer the question âIs murder a sin?â with âDepends: who are we talkin’ about?â
In uncut gems, the protagonist is Goodness, we follow the plot arc of Right, and Right, as it should, ultimately triumphs in the end. The vehicle for this lesson, however, is a sad sack of a meatbag: Adam Sandler watches a basketball game instead of tucking his son into bed; he explodes in anger instead of listening to his girlfriend; and he gambles with borrowed money instead of paying it back.
We empathize with the people around Adam Sandler: the three kids, the wife, the loan shark, the girlfriend. We even feel sorry for Sandler sometimes: Heâs compulsive, but heâs right. We think, “I’m compulsive but right.” But Uncut Gems shows us: “Here’s where those two traits can lead you…”
So we’re oddly satisfied when Sandlerâs big bet finally pays off… and is punctuated by him being shot in the head. “Those who gamble with others’ lives should pay with their own.“
This movie does not merely show us how the world is; it describes how the world ought to be. Good should prevail while bad gets shot in the head, even if it’s that adorable goofball who starred in Happy Gilmore.
It’s not a pleasant film. You probably won’t enjoy it. Or you’ll enjoy it the way you enjoy going to the dentist and hearing stories about The Holocaust: it hurts but it’s ultimately good for you.
So process your trauma, overcome your compulsions, and watch Uncut Gems when you want something reeeeeeally intense.
My current list: (at least in the arts):
Dear Mom & Dad,
This November, I will be voting for Biden/Harris.
I know that you donât agree with this decision. It is important to me that you know why I made it. For all of these sections, I have rigorously researched and considered the options. I hope youâll take a few minutes to read and consider my findings. Iâm happy to discuss them further.
In short, voting for Donald Trump puts my career, my health, my safety, and the planet at risk. I know this sounds extreme. I know this makes me sound like a sensitive snowflake/cupcake/lefty liberal. Despite this, I believe my conclusion is reasonable. Iâm legitimately scared for what my future will look like if Trump wins in 2020.
Since Donald Trump was elected in 2016, I have been sexually assaulted⌠more times than I care to remember. One was a co-worker grabbing my ass and cornering me at a party. Some others were multiple men deciding their right not to use a condom was more important than our agreement to use protection. Earlier this month, a man literally non-consensually pinned me down and grabbed me by the pussy.Â
When Iâve called these men out for their behavior, they all responded with the same words: âI was in the moment.â I donât want to live in a world where thatâs an acceptable excuse. Could you imagine if we lived in a world where that was an acceptable excuse for any other type of violence?
These arenât just bad apples. For the most part, these men are good people. Theyâre fitness junkies, music enthusiasts, and Ivy League graduates. Theyâre sons, friends, and brothers. Someday they may be fathers and partners.
Their behavior is more than their own: itâs a direct result of the culture we live in.
We live in a world where the Proud Boys are operating on a core tenant of âVenerating the Housewife.â Not the stay at home parent. Not the wife/partner. The housewife, whose only permissible occupation is caring for the family.
We live in a world where if a man decides he wants to have sex with me at any time, even non-consensually, it would take a public and excruciating trial to attempt to enforce any legal repercussions. Where I have to expect continued sexual assault, in various forms, as a reality. And where I continue to âdo nothingâ in fear that any action I take will have severe repercussions.Â
We live in a world where the president of the United States has laughed off the fact that he, and other men, can âdo anything you wantâ to women and itâs okay because they âjust let you do itâ as locker room talk.
Thatâs not the world that I want to continue living in. In order to make this a reality, I need leadership who–at a minimum does not embody this behavior so blatantly and unapologetically–and at a maximum passes legislation to protect people like me.Â
This fall, I got the chance to explore Yosemite, one of the most beautiful corners of the world. Immediately after, I spent weeks trapped inside my apartment with a sore throat and burning eyes because the air quality was unlivable. Literally unlivable. The-sun-is-merely-an-orange-glow-obscured-by-haze unlivable. Youâre experiencing the same suffering in Colorado as I write this letter.
Trump has pointed to poor forest management as the cause of these fires. This means he carries just as much of the blame. For 2021, Trump has reduced funding for state and private forestry programs by $12.48 million compared to 2020. Additionally, Trump has threatened to stop FEMA funding for victims of wildfires in California when over 60% of the forest in the state is federal property (and under Trumpâs jurisdiction).
Whether you believe in global warming/climate change is irrelevant. Whether you believe in forest management is irrelevant. In the case of the wildfires impeding your quality of life and mine, Trump is not practicing what heâs preaching and is not putting our money where his mouth is.
And just like how human intervention can make the problem worse, human intervention can make our communities healthier to live in.
On the financial health side, a vote for Trump is a vote to make [my siblings] more likely to be ineligible for your healthcare. Itâs also a vote that makes it more difficult and expensive for you to obtain health insurance outside of a traditional employer. I donât want our familyâs flexibility or health to be impacted that way–our lungs, our loves, and our lives.
On September 22, 2020, President Donald Trump signed an Executive Order effectively banning anti-racism and anti-sexism workshops in the workplace. You can read the official order from the White House here. Iâve read it. All of it. While some may interpret this executive order as having good intentions, my research has led me to believe that [interpretation] is misguided at best. At worst, it appears to me that the language in this order has been manipulated to prevent further progress for racial and gender equality in the workplace.
This executive order directly impedes my initiative to create a more inclusive and diverse culture at [my employer, a well-respected tech company].
As you both know, Iâve been working with the executive team to build our companyâs first Inclusion and Diversity program. Our employees are predominantly white and male. There isnât anything inherently wrong with that. However, it means that as a young woman in the company, I notice and fall victim to blind spots caused by unconscious bias at a significantly higher rate than most of my colleagues. For example, early in my time at [my employer], I realized that I was the only person being asked to take notes in meetings. While this is an important task, it also restricted my ability to actively participate. I gave my colleagues the benefit of the doubt, I didnât think they were assigning this task (and/or expecting me to handle it without asking) maliciously. However, it was important for me to point out the pattern before a precedent was set. Itâs possible, and understandable, that a colleague of mine couldâve gotten the promotion over me because they participated more in meetings. Itâs also possible–and likely–that this task could follow me even if I was promoted. This is something that happens to many young women in their careers as a direct result of gender stereotyping (whether intentional or completely unconsciously!)
Fortunately, I felt comfortable enough to point out this pattern to my manager. Unfortunately, my manager was not equipped with the vocabulary, experience, or resources to feel equally comfortable in that conversation. This is understandable; Iâve been aware of this issue for my entire career. This was likely the first time he was asked to consider it.
Regardless of my good intentions, this conversation made my manager feel uncomfortable. My manager didnât actively mean to impede my ability to participate and may have been embarrassed of this unconscious bias.Â
Trumpâs order states that âGovernment contractors shall not use any workplace training that inculcates in its employees any form of race or sex stereotyping or any form of race or sex scapegoating.â This includes content where âany individual should feel discomfort, guilt, anguish, or any other form of psychological distress on account of his or her race or sex.â
As of this summer, [my employer] is a government contractor. Under this order, a training that I helped organize–one that would help colleagues like my manager understand how a history of gender stereotyping continues to exist in our workplace and build habits to combat this harmful bias–could be seen as a risk for the company. While I am not asking that men feel discomfort on the account that they are men, I am asking that we explore unconscious biases that exist for many men due to their life experience. This in itself could be considered a stereotype. For our executive team, which consists of entirely white men (aside from our HR director who is working with me on this program), this equality-seeking program would likely be a risk they arenât willing to take.Â
The order claims that it was enacted to âpromote economy and efficiency in Federal contracting, to promote unity in the Federal workforce, and to combat offensive and anti-American race and sex stereotyping and scapegoating.â
For hundreds of years, assuming women were incapable of holding positions of leadership in corporate America was considered American sex stereotyping. Restricting conversation around our current challenges in the movement for gender and racial equality in the workplace directly restricts our ability to make progress.Â
How much should I care about the economy if I canât be an equal player in it?
I know that Biden isnât the ideal candidate. I know you have concerns about his family, his mental fitness, and his policies. For me, the importance and urgency of these criticisms fail in comparison to the concerns Iâve expressed above. Iâd rather address these concerns for four years before the next election than with people being more comfortable assaulting me.
I know youâre tired of encountering ignorant people saying awful things about the President. I know youâre tired of the left and the media ignoring the working class people in this country who are disadvantaged and under-served. I know youâre tired of empty promises from career politicians.
But I also need you to know that itâs crucial for me to vote for Biden/Harris and itâs also crucial for me that they win. In that, I have to ask that you reconsider your vote.
Voting for Donald Trump is voting for men to continue to get promoted faster and paid more than me. No matter how hard I work. And preventing me from speaking about it.
Voting for Donald Trump is voting to delay action that ensures we can breathe clean air and obtain affordable health care.
Voting for Donald Trump is voting for a continued culture of locker room talk that validates the aggressive and sexually assaultive behavior of the men around me.
This November, Iâm asking you to consider my future over politics. Iâm asking you to have my best interest at heart – as you have for my entire life. [I’m asking you to vote for Biden/Harris.]
With love, admiration, and respect,
Your daughter
[Context: Colin Jost hosts the “Weekend Update” feature on Saturday Night Live, was a former head writer on that same show, is currently engaged to Scarlett Johannson, and recently published a memoir entitled “A Very Punchable Face.”]
Our society tends to idolize the successful. Thatâs glaringly obvious, not profound, so hereâs the importance: what do you mean when you say âsuccessfulâ? Because looking at his life from the outside, one could accurately say ” Colin Jost is successful” in the standard American way. But dear lord, does he have an inner life at all, let alone a rich one?
Youâre not supposed to speculate about someoneâs inner life based on observed behavior (thanks, Scott Adams (creator of Dilbert)), but a memoir typically dives into the psyche of the author, articulates what itâs like to be them, and helps you come out the other side with some sort of emotional connection. No, not every memoir does that. Some are just stories of amusing anecdotes that the author has strung together for want of an additional platform to be heard… And thatâs the problem.
Here: let me give you an example:
And you strung those stories together. Shouldnât it have emotional appeal?
Itâs like the only emotionality I felt in the whole book was that one specific section about 9/11, because it was sufficiently gory and scary and intense and Big to overcome any blockers that Colin had put up⌠not because it had any human emotion whatsoever.
I teared up during that section for the denotative facts, despite Colinâs method of telling it, not because of it. Iâve overheard conversations on the street that have turned my head with more emotionally-evocative lines. Itâs like Colin wrote the equivalent of a Michael Bay anecdote when he should have written a Woody Allen (i.e. something that Feels).
I donât mean to insult Colin Jost; he seems like a nice person (and may different priorities than me), but to my taste, niceness only gets you so far. Iâd rather someone were an authentic, direct, honest asshole than a pretentious nice dude (Colinâs form of âniceâ seems like the one frequently found in the Catholic church, and one which Iâm not even sure itâs accurate to call âniceâ because itâs closer to âpoliteâ and this politeness very frequently actually leads to the opposite of being âniceâ or âkindâ, such as when heâs about to drown but doesnât want to disturb another groupâs nearby surfing trip so he covers up the fact that heâs nearly drowning, and what if he actually drowned? wouldnât that be like the least nice thing to doâto demolish someoneâs family surfing trip with the sight of your bloated corpse? (a true reference from the book; the family on the surfing trip was Jimmy Buffettâs.)).
Iâm deeply saddened to have read a book that includes a memoir about âParisian teens throwing tomatoes at me, then I throw a bicycle over the fence that surrounds the MusĂŠe dâOrsay, and then I hide from the French cops in my hotel room with Scarlett Johanssonâ (paraphrase) and have the whole thing read precisely as emotionally bland as that summary that I just wrote in this here sentence. Go read that sentence again, then read the relevant section (the antepenultimate chapter, âTomato, Potatoâ), and Iâll be damned if this two-bit summary doesnât have about the same amount of emotional depth, of human connection, of evocative, stomach-pulling impact as the original. And thatâs sad. Thatâs sad. Thatâs really, really sad. Itâs sad in the sort of way I canât share in this review because itâs the sort of sad that you feel when you look at an old person whoâs drunk their life away and ask âwhat if you had learned to cope properly when you were young?â. Itâs sad in the sort of way that itâs sad that such a large section of now and future human populations will never, ever, ever look to the heavens and see the Milky Way or stars. Itâs sad in a profoundly sad way that parallels my sadness at my inability to communicate directly to you just how sad this sadness is, and how it reminds me that we, as individual humans who do not share experiences, are at our cores forever alone.
Listen:
We can train a person to do repeated, fancy tricks at expert levels to satisfy specific societal needs. And thatâs nice. Sure. It’s a pretty cool skill. But it also feels fundamentally disrespectful of what it is to be human. It misses out on really existing in this universe, a universe that has been thusfar insufficiently explored. It ignores what it feels like to have someone lack agency because theyâre so scared they canât look inwardly at themselves to see the fetters that bind.
Colin Jostâs memoir made me first and foremost sad: sad for Catholics, sad for people who grow up to hate their emotions/feelings/explorations of self, sad for people taught to trust some external force instead of their instincts, and sad for myself because Iâm sure there are areas of myself I have insufficiently explored due to some of that good olâ inter-generational trauma. Jostâs memoir isnât even intending to be a sad book; thatâs the sad part: itâs meant to make you laugh.
Thereâs a point in my stomachâto the left and below my sternumâwhere my Emotional Authenticity lives (no joke). Thereâs no special sauce or divinity or whatnot to that place; itâs simply a spot that helps me feel myself. When I notice that spot, I connect with some aspect thatâs much closer to Oneness or Honesty or God or Accuracy or Freedom or Truth than I usually feel. And that specific spot is where I happen to feel it. And I found that spot after going to PTSD therapy for a few months, then finding a specific shamanistic ritual, and then spending hours and hours and hours and hours over years and years feeling Lonely and Grieving and Crying In The Shower (and the like). And that, my friends, is what we call The Work. Itâs The Work of being human, of stripping away what we think is true and getting closer to whatâs actually, truly, truly true. Itâs learning about Me and You and Reality and What Exists and Where We Are and Where Weâre Going and all sorts of other capital activities. Thatâs My Quest and Iâm damn proud of it. And Iâm glad different people are on different quests but I still canât in good conscience read a book like Colinâsâeven one where he implies he likes his lifeâwithout thinking âI donât think you know what Life is.â.
An alternate option: maybe Colin is right. Maybe the Right Job is the one where he laughs every day for fifteen years. Where he fritters away the time in a way that feels satisfying but that (to me, at least) seems sad. Maybe the Right Choice for Colin is having a plurality of his memoir-worthy adult stories start with âI was really drunkâŚâ (paraphrase) and end with the moral âsometimes I do stupid things and am clearly still traumatized by my upbringing, family history/background, (former) religion, etc.â (again, paraphrase, but this moral itâs the basic message of like every story, from the time he almost drowned because he was to unwilling to admit he had gotten himself in a spot of trouble while surfing; to the time when he broke his hand because he was unwilling to admit his own physical inability to punch with proper form; to the time he shit his pants; to the time he was too unwilling to cause a fuss when hosting the Emmyâs and therefore hosted what by all accounts (including his own) was a boring and poorly-done Emmyâs (entitled âWorst Emmys Everâ)). My only respite (glint of hope?) from these morals is that heâs consistently seeing problems in his former behavior and improving them, which is the point and Iâm glad heâs doing it, but heâs also missing the point: the point of all these morals is not the denotative âI made this mistake; look at meâ learning he seems to think it is (and which would prompt some growth), but the underlying principles and structures of behavior/thinking that create the same mistakes over and over and over again. Colin, if youâre reading this: no amount of funny story or chuckle of âOh, Iâm always like thatâ will actually arrive you at the necessary honest self-viewing for you to heal and grow into a bigger, more satisfying and more accurate life. Look at Dennis Rodman and Jim Carrey as examples. Or Patton Oswalt or Dave Chappelle. Itâs the difference between living a life and killing time, and I donât know if you know youâve been killing time.
Thereâs a sadness in the heart of many most comedians, myself included. I just analyze it. I poke it. I approach it and really, truly try to understand it. I use it to ask how society works and why Iâand the worldâam the way I am. I wonder what happened to me and dive in when Iâm afraid. (Except when I donât dive in because Iâm afraid⌠which we all do from time to time, and The Work seeks to minimize.). Thereâs a Scientific Method thatâs respectable from pretty much everybody in this capacity and it seems like Colin Jost has just never done it. Heâs worked and worked and worked to achieve the things he wanted, but can he articulate why? Whatâs the point of having a national desk in front of millions of people if you donât have a purpose to achieve with it? If thereâs no point, why do it at all? For a Harvard dude, heâs shockingly surface-level. Compare him to Conan, another fellow SNL writer and Harvard Lampooner, and you see night and day. Conan cares about Comedy itself, about Making People Laugh, about Entertainment (all Big Things)⌠Colin cared about getting a job, then about getting on SNL, and then about hosting Weekend Update (a bigger, better–his dream job)⌠thatâs the difference: If you care for The Art, youâll find ways to achieve it; if you care for your job, youâll always fall flat. (This comparison is unfortunately a tad reductionist; these are my impressions from reading Colinâs memoir and listening to a huge amount of Conanâs podcast; I believe theyâre accurate, but necessarily lacking nuance (because I, unfortunately, canât observe their inner life).)
Conan still has, to this day, Howard Sternâs favorite interview because itâs one in which Conan speaks about his depression, questions how his comedy functions in relation to his depression, and voices his worries about whether medicating himself would make him less funny. Colin canât do that⌠at least I think he canât, because a memoir is itself like the most emotionally evocative art form (short of nude self-portrait), and Colin 100% completely missed the emotional mark. (If he can do that, it makes me concerned why he didnât here: he would have had to decide that actually honestly opening up in our current age of technology and social movements would be worseâfar worseâthan just publishing a memoir that is the emotional equivalent of eating popcorn. But I donât think that was Colin’s intent: throughout the book Iâm continually berated by the perception that he does really truly keep trying to do Big things; he wants to do Important things that Matter, etc., and that leads me to the conclusion that if he knew how to be emotionally open he would, because heâd see the connection between âgreat memoirâ and âemotional connectionâ thatâs so patently obvious). Iâm reminded of David Foster Wallaceâs review âHow Tracy Austin broke my heartâ for the similarities in what Jostâs memoir implies about the state of both himself and our current world:
Itâs really, truly, profoundly sad that someone who our society dubs âsuccessfulâ can have such a vapid existence. Is this really the best of our generation? A top comedianâthe one hosting SNL Weekend Update and head writing for what is still our nationâs (the worldâs?) biggest comedy broadcastâcompletely lacks in internal substance. Thatâs. Really. Sad. It implies that the vapidity of everyday life has infested comedy, which is itself sad, and then that sadness globs onto comedy itself, so weâre left with comedy now becoming sad, which is sad turtles all the sad way sad down, which is even sadder than the sad fact that me sad-reading this sad guyâs sad memoir about his âcomedyâ life where he âcomedyâ stars on a âsuccessful” show and then âsuccessfullyâ becomes “successfully” engaged to âsuccessfulâ Scarlett Johansson is not successful nor comedy at all but just another terrible and heartbreaking example of how growing up Catholic traumatizes someone.
But itâs not exactly precisely that, because Conan OâBrien also grew up Catholic, and look how he turned out⌠Still traumatized, yes, but so much more self-aware (and so much more emotionally vulnerable). So what it is it? Is it the family stifling? Is it the lack of real, intense world challenges (because the worst that Colin ever had to go through is some time spent unsure how heâll pay rent in New York City? Is it instead that he has actually suffered in real ways (which is probably, statistically true, if only based on his age and the existence of his 9/11 story) and simply lacks the self-examination and Work to articulate them well and/or feels a terrible, crippling fear that honestly sharing real stories with readers (instead of, say, âthe time I pooped my pantsâ (real story; paraphrased title)) will somehow be bad for his life/career, not good?
While the unexamined life may still be worth living, the inauthentic or dishonest or inaccurate or lying life is worse than nothing because weâre social animals and life is a team sport. Whether youâre a cog in your own wheel or youâre a cog in someone elseâs or youâre just some tiny ant carrying a boulder up a Great Big Cosmic Hill every day so you can let it roll down again to repeat your Quest, youâve got to look at the world and say what it is because if you donât, how will we know? (And also because the truth you seek is probably parallel to one you’re withholding from others.)
Thereâs one great moment of self-awareness in this book that jumps out as insightful and clever and aware (and which moment on retrospect is really just an average level of awareness, but its being surrounded by non-awareness makes it seem more aware, much like how one would observe a diamond to be shinier if said diamond were surrounded by horse poop). (Not that the book is horse poop; the book is merely awareness horse poop.):
Itâs the moment when Colin says, in a footnote, âI want to make it very clear that this list of notes [requests for changes to upcoming sketches] provided to the SNL staff by NBC censors is not exclusively notes they gave to me because I donât want people to read this and think Iâm racist/sexist/homophobic/[other similar categories] and therefore to âcancelâ me.â (paraphrase). Thatâs it. Thatâs our big olâ nugget of self-awareness, and itâs not even self awareness qua self awareness per se; itâs only self-awareness because you read it and think âthereâs a guy who sees where he fits with respect to one specific national trend that clearly (and justifiably) frightens himâ, but we don’t think, âthereâs a guy who knows something about Himself or Society or Profundity or Existenceâ; it’s merely âthis guy sees a thing and is afraidâ, which might be the single simplest emotional state for a human an animal of any kind. Thatâs the only emotion that comes across in this book: Fear. *Sigh*. Fear of authenticity, fear of emotion, fear of society, fear of loss… The big one-two punch, blockbuster ending (the epilogue; the last pages of the book; the final point Colin leaves the reader withâŚ) is Colin saying âMaybe Iâll leave SNL someday because I want to dive deep into one topic instead of staying shallow in many by doing standup/sketches/movies all at once⌠and maybe I wonâtâ (paraphrase). Wow. *Sigh Again*. That’s not an ending; that’s a waffle. Thatâs worse than the fact that your last chapter is “this one time bugs planted eggs in my leg” (paraphrase) instead of, say, something that matters.
Look, kid, Colin, dude: could you please just lock yourself in a room and think? Maybe draw a bath and talk to yourself aloud. Try sitting alone and being uncomfortable. (Not the punish-yourself Catholic Church uncomfortable, but the explore-yourself uncomfortable of recovering from the Catholic Church.) Set aside a day to be just with yourself: no internet, no food, no people, no alcohol. (Fasting helps most people introspect: Iâd suggest only drinking water on this Colin-Internal day.) Ask questions. Wait for answers. Ask more questions. Keep wondering. And if you start crying, let yourself cry (because thatâs what you seriously, clearly, really need). Feel man, just feel, and grieve for your past. Because reading your book made me so, so sad for the lack of grieving youâve done. Iâve thought a few times about Steve Martin while writing this review; his memoir Born Standing Up clearly shows self-reflection: thereâs one section where he says âIâm going to give you the juicy bits that you want now, because thatâs something that has to happen in a memoirâ (paraphrase), and then he gives us some juicy bits, and then he says âIâm not going to tell you any more because those are mineâ (paraphrase). Itâs a beautiful understanding of The Memoir, of its Art and Function and Place and Form, and it clearly shows Steve knows how he wants to go about the world. This is a man who performed to sold out stadia, then dropped it entirely to become a top-billing actor, and then dropped that to, to switch to the⌠banjo? Because playing the banjo is right for him.
Colin, homie, ol’ buddy ol pal: I donât get the impression that you know what you want. And knowing what youâyes, you, Colin Jostâwant is the single most important question you will ever answer. And not knowing itânot giving it the depth and curiosity it deservesâwill leave you and your descendants as hollow shells. Youâll drink on special occasions âbecause thatâs what people doâ. Youâll constantly wonder if thereâs More. (There is.) Youâll blip into the comedy sphere before fading away, never to Matter because you werenât relatable, because: To be relatable an audience must connect emotionally with you, and for us to connect with you, you must be available, and to become available, you must first feel your emotions, and thenâonly thenâcan you open yourself up to the world. Emotional awareness is nigh step #1 to Seeing The World and Communicating Whatâs True. (At least it was for me: Emotional Awareness, and, well, duh, Logic. (Also Introspection and Patience and Slowness and speed. And Science and Experiment and…)
I feel drained after writing that bit. This whole review feels really intense, like itâs a Great Big Commentary on more than my feelings about one book: itâs A Great Big Commentary on America and Religion and Isolation and Loneliness and Trust and Censorship and Fear and Shame as seen through American Comedy. Also because Scarlett Johannsen is apparently engaged to Colin Jost (of which interesting details are impressively avoided in a shockingly un-self aware wayâso impressively-poorly-avoided that I was curious for a moment whether it was intended as a satire but I donât think anyone could pull off that level of satire except for, say, Steve Martin if his choice to devote his life to the banjo was itself a big Andy Kaufman-esque practical joke on the world, but I donât think people actually do that in the world, well except for Andy Kaufman and heâs almost certainly dead) and I find that relationship between ScarJo and ColJo particularly jarring because she was one of the first women I ever swooned for (and therefore the woman after whom I named my highschool tennis rackets), and to see my perception of her (emotionally accessible, malleable, and aware) with my perception of him (basically, like, the opposite…) is like watching clay feet stand on top of feet that I didnât know were clay because I thought they were just like normal feet but it turns out theyâre some sort of leprosied clay, and now both of their pair of deformed, taloned hands try to touch the sky but donât realize theyâre in the middle of a film shoot in the desert thatâs actually just a series of bright lights oven-baking clay, and when those lights turn off the pair crumbles to dust.
Perhaps Iâm reading too much into this, but damn it Colin, your book makes me sad. Iâm sad for you, Colin, and I want to help.
[Actually, though: after a half-decade of suffering through an old PTSD, I found two specific modes of therapy that finally helped. Iâd be happy to share them with anyone who wants; reach out anytime: letâs heal the wound world.]